My interest in photography began in the 1960’s But I had three problems. No dark room, very little skill at the time, and even less money (I was a paper boy). I would look at photo magazines, and marvel at what was possible. Especially the images I saw that were made on large format cameras.
“Someday” I thought. Someday I will have the right gear, the dark room and the budget to really get the right stuff. I knew I could acquire the requisite skills, if I just had the stuff.
Along came excellent 35mm cameras
As time progressed, so did my career and budget, so I fully embraced the 35mm format. Primarily, I shot with Minolta SRT 101 and Pentax K1000. My images were getting better, and I moved from B/W that I would develop in a small tank to the color films I would get developed at a lab. My love for photography was pretty well satisfied in the 35mm world.
Digital photography opened some doors
Still using crop and full-frame sensors I had become very familiar with the 35mm aspect ratio. I was even foolish enough to believe that, with enough pixels and the ability to print large images, large format did not bring a lot to the table.
I was wrong of course. The more I would study large format images and with the benefit of study groups, mentors fellow photographers, I soon became aware of the technical and qualitative differences.
For example, on a full frame 35mm digital camera a 50mm lens is considered “normal.” Normal in the sense of having the perspective of the unaided eye. On a larger format camera like my 4 x 5 Graflex Speed Graphic, a normal lens would be considered roughly 150mm.
Longer focal lengths reduce the depth of field. When shooting the same image with a 50mm lens and a 150mm lens, the latter will have a shallower depth of field. That dramatically changes the feel an look of an image.
I discovered I can attach my digital cameras to my 4×5 camera
I discovered through an internet search that Fotodiox makes adapters that allow photographers to attach some full frame digital cameras to large format cameras that have a Graflok back. I actually knew about them for a while but just recently purchased a mirrorless camera for which Fotodiox makes an adapter.
The process requires:
mounting the camera to the to the adapter,
mounting the adapter to the Graflok Mount on the large format camera,
moving the camera to pre-defined positions on the adapter to take full advantage of the image circle,
stitching the images together using Photoshop or other software,
completing final edits.
In my case, I added a couple of extra steps because of my workflow. I shoot with a 60+MP digital camera, and I always shoot in Raw format. Hence, the sheer size of the source images makes things very time-consuming. Therefore:
I load my images into CaptureOne (my preferred Raw editor) and edit images for consistency, remove dust, etc.
Export them as 2-5 MP .jpg files.
Use Photoshop to create the composite.
Save as .psd files (about 40MB-150MB ea.)
Perform the final edits of .psd files in CaptureOne
If all goes well, then I know it’s worth taking the time to create very high-res, very large .psd files using the raw images.
6 images used for composite
The Photoshop composite (note the banding caused by vignetting of individual images)
After final export, cropping and editing.
Some final notes
In my case, my camera did not have a Graflok back but I was able to buy parts on Ebay. For the most part they worked great except as I move the digital camera around it tends to lose a little focus. To compensate, I refocus every image.
For some cameras that have large grips, a “Stretch” adapter is needed and actually moves the camera farther back from the focal plane. In my case that camera is about 50mm behind the actual film plane. Usually that would mean focusing at infinity would be impossible.
Fortunately, I was able to move the lens far enough back and lock it into place to achieve infinite focus. The net effect is also an increase in focal length. The focal length of the lens on my Graflex is 127mm so I estimate my net effective focal length is around 177+/-.
For this image, the sky was bright enough that I lowered the exposure 1 stop for the sky shots.
This process is not fast, and that is a good thing. It slows me down, and I spend more time on the composition and details.
