Adobe Inc., the well-known software company behind popular tools like Photoshop and Illustrator, is facing a lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC claims that Adobe deceived customers with hidden fees and a complicated cancellation process, violating consumer protection laws.
The FTC claims that Adobe’s sign-up process does not adequately inform customers about the commitments they are making. Important details such as early termination fees (ETFs) that can amount to hundreds of dollars, are often buried in fine print or obscured by optional textboxes and hyperlinks. Many users only become aware of these fees after attempting to cancel their subscriptions.
According to the FTC, cancelling these subscriptions is no straightforward task. The process reportedly involves multiple pop-up screens, password re-entries, and other obstacles designed to make cancellation difficult. Some users who believed they had successfully canceled continued to be charged.
The complaint also describes issues with phone and live chat cancellations, where calls and chats were frequently dropped, requiring customers to restart the process.
The lawsuit names senior Adobe executives Maninder Sawhney, Senior Vice President of Digital Go-To-Market & Sales, and David Wadhwani, President of Adobe’s Digital Media business, alleging their involvement in these practices. The FTC seeks to halt these actions and impose financial penalties.
Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, expressed consumer frustration:
“People are tired of companies making it difficult to understand and cancel subscriptions.”
Adobe disputes the allegations. Dana Rao, Adobe’s General Counsel and Chief Trust Officer, responded:
“We believe we are clear about the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and offer a straightforward cancellation process. We will contest the FTC’s claims in court.”
This lawsuit draws attention to the broader regulatory focus on subscription-based business models. Adobe, which transitioned to a subscription model in 2012, has faced criticism from users who feel trapped in its ecosystem due to high cancellation costs. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for future regulations in the industry.
As this legal battle progresses, it highlights the importance of transparency and fairness in subscription services, with both consumers and regulators closely monitoring the developments.
If you liked this story, please follow us and subscribe to our free daily newsletter.
